Doctorow's Emphasis on the Effects of Wealth
Throughout Ragtime, Doctorow
delineates the lives of two separate families: Mother, Father and the little
boy, and Tateh and the little girl. These two families heavily differ in their social
and financial statuses, and therefore also in their ways of life. The little
boy is full of excitement for his future, while the girl lives in fear of her
past. The contrast between the little girl and the little boy in Ragtime,
as well as between Tateh and Father, exemplifies the enduring disparate frames
of mind that derive from different upbringings.
Tateh and Father are two extremely
different men who came from separate upbringings, yet Tateh has become satisfied
with his life, while Father has not. Tateh is a Jewish immigrant who lost his
wife and has raised his daughter on his own. He previously lived an unhappy
life, but always found passion in his art. Although it was risky and difficult,
Tateh decided to move from New York to find a better life for him and his daughter.
It didn’t come easily, but Tateh was able to work his way up from the bottom and
get his art “out there”. He is now in filmmaking, has quite a lot of money, and
is excited for his future. Father, on the other hand, came from a wealthy
family. He learned from his father and played it safe in life. He followed a
mold of what he “should” do based on societal expectations. Father has money
and a family but has never felt truly fulfilled in himself and what he does. Doctorow
shows through this comparison that money does not mean happiness and the people
who start from “the top” are not necessarily content with their lives. The book
illustrates the idea that coming from the bottom and chasing your passion to
the top is far more self-satisfying and respectable.
Doctorow also shows how various
upbringings affect the minds of the youth. Little boy is seen as someone who is
excited for the life laid ahead of him. He lives inspired by the world that he
lives in, quite possibly because he has seen no evil. Little girl lives in fear
of the life she is most acquainted with, one of poverty and sorrow. This comparison
is depicted in a scene of the two children running. Little girl runs away from
her memories while little boy runs to his future. Little boy dreams of his coming
life while little girl has nightmares of her past. Quite possibly, little girl
will realize in some years’ time the importance of hard work and passion, given
by the example of Tateh. She may end up working hard for what she cares about
and taking the necessary risks to fulfill her dreams because she never wants to
experience her old life again. The little boy may have an abundance of amazing
dreams, but if he was never taught to chase them, it’s possible that he won’t
reach them. Doctorow compares the two children’s mindsets and outlooks on life
to show the importance of one’s upbringing on their life perspective.
In Ragtime, Doctorow often narrates with a tone of respect for the people who worked their ways up but narrates with an undertone of irony for the people who “got it easy”. He shows the importance of hard work and chasing your dreams through the contrasting lives of Tateh and Father. Tateh started from nothing but rose to eventually becoming fulfilled and excited to live. Father stayed at an “unhappy medium” of life and never has felt entirely satisfied with who he is. Doctorow also indicates the importance of one’s upbringing on their mindset and possible motivations. The little girl might work extremely hard to prevent ever having to return to the life she once lived, while the little boy might believe that everything in life will come easily for him, and never actually reach his most successful self. Overall, Doctorow compares various characters to express disdain for the wealthy who don’t work hard and the poor who go face extreme ordeals before eventual happiness and stability.
This was really good! I thought it was really interesting how you interpreted the scene with the two kids running, and how the little boy may never reach his dreams if "he was never taught to chase them". I also agree Doctorow seems to have more respect for Tateh due to his struggles then Father or even JP Morgan. Excellent work!
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I really like how you are comparing the different characters in this analyzation. At times I think Doctorow's characters and plot seem to be unrelated and loosely connected. I think, however, comparing as you did can leave valuable insights on the class dynamics and contrasts that Doctorow wishes to portray. Definitely a unique analyzation and a good one!
ReplyDeleteI agree, we can definitely see a change in tone in Doctorow's narration when talking about characters like JP Morgan, people who were born into wealth, and people who worked their way up like Tateh. I also liked the way you contrasted the little boy and the little girl based on the different lives that they have lived. Nice post!
ReplyDeleteIn class, I don't think we included Tateh in the short list of characters who are spared Doctorow's irony, for the most part. I agree that his story is generally narrated with a degree of respect and deference, even shared joy (when we meet him after his transformation into the Baron Ashkenazy), that is fully absent from narratives around Morgan, or Ford, or the New Rochelle Family. The Little Boy, too, is treated as an almost visionary or psychic character by the narrator (how to explain him telling Houdini to "warn the Duke"?), and in this way he too seems to be spared the irony.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your comparison of the fathers and the children. Mother has a unique position because she is a part of both families and bridges the gap between the two. To go along with the theme of happiness, Mother is more submissive and serious around Father, but becomes much more joyful around Tateh. Doctorow seems to use this as another indication that Tateh is successful in a way that goes beyond money, but Father is only successful in his wealth.
ReplyDeleteI really liked the part where you mention that the little girl runs from her memories while the little boy runs to his future. I think it paints a good picture as to how their previous life experiences affected their present. I also think it ties well with your point about how the little girl could have a bright future because she was taught to work hard by her father, while the little boy could have an unseccesful future because of his comfort in his wealth.
ReplyDeleteGreat analyzation! I like how you focus on Doctorow's application of irony. I would like to point out that after Tateh gains wealth and success, he constructs an almost completely different persona: the Baron Ashkenazy. Doctorow treats this new Tateh (or the Baron) with some condescending irony. Describing this carefree, capitalist Baron, Doctorow subtly mocks Tateh for becoming this drastically different person with conflicting views (socialist vs. capitalist, rich vs. poor, carefree vs. cautious and strict). This irony of Tateh's and the Baron's conflicting identities is most prominent when he meets Mother. The Baron quickly becomes infatuated with Mother, taking the initiative to steal glances at her and eventually converse with her. As the Baron, Tateh pursues Mother despite having previously sworn off romantic relationships due to his experiences with Mameh and Evelyn Nesbit.
ReplyDelete